Ruthless Good Topics for an Argumentative Essay Strategies Exploited

Ruthless Good Topics for an Argumentative Essay Strategies Exploited The Civil war was among the deadliest wars that ever happened in the usa. Topic might be related to politics. Freedom to choose subjects you need to study. The Pain of Good Topics for an Argumentative Essay There are lots of aspects about a sport that may be argued in an essay. Understanding how to compose a strong argumentative paper can help you advance your very own argumentative thinking. Argumentative writings is a particular sort of a paper. You have to come across decent evidence to strengthen your ideas along with examples to illustrate the evidence. Position essays are extremely typical in high school. Some topics might ask you to provide more proof than other people to demonstrate the relation between the cause and effect. For a 6th-grade pupil, choosing only the appropriate subject for the upcoming essay might be a genuine challenge. At this time you've got to be in a position to understand the differences between both topics you'll be presented with. One more thing you must concentrate on is your vocabulary. Our topics are good since they won't leave listeners indifferent. You must also check at the grammar and language. Additionally, inspect the sources you may utilize to base your arguments on. You concentrate on the validity or otherwise of the arguments provided in the essay. When you write this kind of essay, you should offer the reader with a specific statement and stick to it throughout the text. In this kind of situation, it's more convenient to discover ready-made essays and use them as an example. Argumentative essay is about arguing and debating on a subject, which is debatable. Researching the topic will enable you to find out more about what fascinates you, and should you pick something you truly like, writing the essay will be more enjoyable. Argumentative research paper topics are a ton much easier to find than to produce. Instead of just immediately writing about your argumentative essay topic, you first have to think about what you're likely to put back on your paper through a procedure of brainstorming and pre-writing. If you are in need of a great essay but have zero opportunity to write it yourself, visit our site and get it. If you must write your whole essay in 1 day, do your very best to give yourself breaks so you don't burn out. When it has to do with writing an argumentative essay, the most essential issue to do is to select a topic and an argument you may really get behind. Regardless of the topic that you're exploring in your argumentative essay, following principles of the structure needs to be maintained to have a decent level. A conclusion is, undoubtedly, the most essential portion of the argumentative essay since you can either support the very good impression or destroy it entirely. It's important to select debatable argumentative essay topics as you need opposing points that you may counter to your own points. Just as with any other essay, you want to begin with an introduction. In reality, all essays are built the exact same. It is possible to buy argumentative essay from us anytime you desire. To come across argumentative essay topics easy on various platforms, you will need to comprehend about the argumentative essay. An argumentative essay is a certain kind of academic writing. Our argumentative essay topic ideas are supposed to save your time when you have to choose what things to write about. Moral argumentative essay topics are a few of the simplest to get carried away with. Recent argumentative essay topics that are related to society is going to do.

Alcohol Is The Number One Drug Used By College Students

According to research and statistics, alcohol is the number one drug used by college students. Most individuals do not label alcohol as a drug due to the way it is consumed, but when considering the negative side effects that accompany alcohol, the comparison of alcohol to drugs may not be that far of a stretch. Alcohol can not only be harmful to an individual’s external health but also their internal health as well. Consumption of alcohol over a long period of time may result in negative side effects to your heart, liver, pancreas, immune system, and ultimately if enough is consumed may result in cancer. This addicting, yet dangerous drug is best known for its ability to relax the body, reduce tension, and ultimately place the body into a†¦show more content†¦(H. Wechsler, 2000) (H. Wechsler, J.E. Lee, M. Kuo, H. Lee, College binge drinking in the 1990s: A continuing problem Journal of American College Health, 48 (2000), pp. 199–210) Statistics show that the a verage college student will consume more than 34 gallons of alcohol each year. From an outside point of view, alcohol may seem harmless and a normal part of the college experience, however research suggests that alcoholism and the college athlete should not in fact go hand in hand. A survey was conducted at a large university and data was collected on intercollegiate athletes during the competitive season and during the off-season. Those who participated in the survey were asked to estimate the amount of alcohol consumption levels of 4 different groups of individuals; closest athlete friend, closest non-athlete friend, typical athlete, and typical non-athlete. Results of both in-season and off-season indicated that the athletes reported that others consumed more drinks per week than they did, and insights of these social averages predicted personal use. Although the typical athlete average emerged as the strongest predictor of personal alcohol use, the relative strength of the rela tionships between individual behavior and the athlete and non-athlete norms varied according to seasonal status. (Kristen Dams-O Connor, November 2007) (Social norms and alcohol consumption among intercollegiate athletes: The role of athlete and non-athlete reference groups, Kristen Dams-O

Capital Puinishment Essay Example For Students

Capital Puinishment Essay Capital Punishment is an Unlawful and Ineffective Deterrent to MurderThe United States is one of the few countries left in the world to practice the savage and immoral punishment of death. Retentionists argue that the consequence of death prevents people from committing the crime of murder. It is proven that the death penalty does not deter persons from committing murder, nor does it serve as an example of the consequences of capital crimes to society. Furthermore, it is impossible to guarantee that the criminal justice system will not discriminate against or execute the innocent. Above all, the methods of execution are horrifying and barbaric, as well as the devaluing of a human life. We must realize that the life of a murderer is worth as much as the life of the victim. An indecent justice, one that takes human lives based on ideals of vengeance and violence, is an immoral system that is unacceptable. The most widely used argument in support of capital punishment is that the conseq uence of execution influences criminal behavior more effectively than imprisonment does (?Against the Death Penalty?). Although the argument may sound reasonable, in reality the death penalty fails as a deterrent. First, punishment can only be a useful deterrent if it is rational and immediately used. Capital punishment cannot meet those conditions. The number of first degree murderers who are sentenced to death is small, and of this group an even smaller number of people are eventually executed. Moreover, the possibility of increasing the number of convicted murderers sentenced to death and executed by requiring mandatory death sentences was declared unconstitutional in 1976 Jewett 2(National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty). Murder and other crimes of violence are not always premeditated. For example; gang violence, drive by shootings and kidnaping for ransom are serious crimes that continue to be committed because the criminal thinks he is too clever to be caught. Most cap ital crimes are committed during times of great emotional trauma or under the influence of drugs or alcohol, when logical thinking is in no doubt absent (NCADP). In such cases, a person will commit a crime of violence regardless of the consequences. The majority of the evidence shows that the death penalty is in no way more effective in deterring murder than life imprisonment. Evidence of past use of the death penalty establishes reasonable doubt that it does not deter murder, and there is no evidence to prove otherwise. In a thorough report on the effects of criminal sanctions on crime rates, the National Academy of Sciences concluded that it is misleading to justify the use of capital punishment on such ?fragile? and ?uncertain? results (NCADP). Moreover, there are clinically documented cases that reveal the death penalty actually provoked the capital crimes it was intended to prevent (Mappes). These include cases involving the so-called ?suicide by execution syndrome? in which a person with a desire to die but also fears taking his own life will commit murder, believing the state will execute him. The use of the death penalty obviously guarantees that the criminal will never commit another crime, for the murderer is dead, but, there is no evidence that capital punishment deters another individual from committing murder (Glover 139). Furthermore, it is a high moral price to pay when studies have proven that few convicted murderers commit further crimes of violence. An alternative, one that is far less inhumane, is a policy of life imprisonment without the Jewett 3possibility of parole (139). It is commonly reported that Americans approve of the death penalty. But, more careful analysis of the attitudes of the public shows that Americans prefer alternatives to capital punishment (Smart). In fact, most Americans would oppose the death penalty if convicted murderers were sentenced to life without parole and required to make some form of financial restitution. I n a 1993 nationwide survey 77 percent of the public approved of the death penalty, but the poll dropped to 41 percent if the alternative is no parole plus restitution (Smart). Only a minority of the American public would favor the death penalty if offered alternatives. By law, the trial and sentencing of the accused must be conducted with the utmost fairness, especially when incorporating the irreversible sanction of the death penalty. Only 88 percent of all executions since 1930 have been for murder (Warner). It is evident that courts have sentenced some criminals to prison while putting others to death, which clearly demonstrates uncertainty, racial prejudices, and simply unfairness. In his article ?American Dilemma? (1944) Gunnar Myrdal reported that the ?South makes the widest application of the death penalty?, and sadly ?Negro criminals are in for much more than their share of the executions? (Warner). Recently a study of capital punishment showed that the current system is an outgrowth of the racist ?legacy of slavery? (NCADP). Between 1930 and 1996, 4,220 prisoners were executed and more than half were black. A disproportionately large number of African Americans have always occupied the nations ?death rows,? considering the percentage of African Americans in the overall population (Dieter 144). During the past century, blacks were more often executed for what were considered less-than-capital offenses for whites, Jewett 4such as rape and burglary (Dieter 145). Furthermore, a large percentage of the blacks who were executed were juveniles, and the number of executions without having ones conviction reviewed by a higher court was higher for blacks (NCADP). In recent years, there has been wide belief that racial discrimination is a thing of the past. However, since the renewal of capital punishment in the mid-1970s, approximately half of the death row population, at any given time, have been black (Smart). When those under the death sentence are examined more closely, it is apparent race is a factor after all. A statistical study of racial discrimination in capital cases in Georgia showed that those convicted of killing a white person were more likely to receive the death penalty in all indicted cases. Further evidence proved unfairness in capital cases as reported by the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO). The GAO review concluded that of the 28 studies there was a ?pattern of evidence indicating racial disparities in the charging, sentencing, and imposition? of the death penalty, and that the ?race of victim influence was found at all stages of the criminal justice system process (Dieter 144). One can conclude that in the courts of the nation, even today, the murder of a white person is treated much more severely than the murder of a black person. Therefore, it can be noted that our criminal system reserves the death penalty for those murderers (regardless of their race) who kill white victims (Dieter 145). Gender and socio-econ omic class also aid in the discrimination of those who will receive a death sentence. Only one percent of all those on death row were women, although women commit about fifteen percent of all criminal homicides (NCADP). Only 33 women, of whom 12 were black, have been executed in the United States since 1930. Fairness in capital cases requires most a competent counsel for the defendant. Yet, 90 percent of those on death row were unable to afford a lawyer when tried. The most common Jewett 5characteristics among death row defendants are poverty, lack of social community, and inadequate legal representation at trial or on appeal (NCADP). The above flaws in the actual administration of capital punishment are only one of the many clear reasons for abolition. In the judgement of the fair-minded and unprejudiced ?capital punishment is a power that cannot be exercised fairly and without discrimination? (Smart). Therefore, we cannot put human lives in the hands of a flawed system, for societ y will suffer the consequences, as well as the victims. Unlike all other criminal punishments, the death penalty is irreversible. Once a criminal is put to death no once can bring back the human life taken when a mistake is discovered too late. However, some supporters of capital punishment argue that its advantages are worth the sacrificing of innocent people, as well as the ideal that there is little chance that the innocent would be executed. Nevertheless, there is evidence showing that from the 1980s to the 1990s innocent people have been convicted of capital crimes as well as executed (?Against the Death Penalty?). Since the 1900s there have been an estimated four cases a year in which an innocent person was convicted of murder, in addition to the many that were sentenced to death (?Against the Death Penalty?). In many cases ? a reprieve or commutation arrived just hours, or even minutes before the scheduled execution? (?Against the Death Penalty?). Those wrongful convictions h ave occurred in almost every jurisdiction in the nation. Furthermore, despite the new death penalty statutes approved by the Supreme Court, the numbers of the wrongfully accused have not declined. Unfortunately, the innocent persons convicted of crimes they did not commit are not always saved from execution or released from their sentences. There are several other cases in which evidence that would have released the convicted was discovered after the execution. These examples explain why the judicial system cannot guarantee that justice will never make mistakes. To retain the death penalty Jewett 6and overlook the serious flaws in the system is unacceptable, especially since there are no strong overriding arguments to favor the death penalty (Glover 145-146). Among the flaws of the justice system, we must remember that the taking of a human life is immoral. The methods used to perform these violent executions are barbaric and unnecessary. But, prisoners continue to be executed in th e United States by any one of five methods; in a few jurisdictions the prisoner is allowed to choose which fate he or she prefers. The methods of capital punishment in use in 1997 included hanging, firing squad, electrocution, suffocation in the lethal gas chamber, and lethal injection (NCADP). The traditional execution by hanging is still used in a few states today. Death on the gallows can make for a slow and agonizing demise by strangulation if the drop is too short. Or, if the drop is too long, the head will be torn off. Two states still use the firing squad method, in which the condemned is hooded, strapped into a chair, and a target is pinned on the chest. Five marksmen take aim and fire (NCADP). During the twentieth century, electrocution has been the most widely applied form of execution in the United States, and still used in eleven states. The prisoner is placed in the death chamber and strapped into the chair with electrodes strapped to the head and legs. When the chair i s activated the body strains and jolts as the intensity of electricity is raised or lowered. It is not known how long the prisoner retains consciousness. In some cases, as with the electrocution of John Evans in Alabama, it takes more than one jolt of electricity to kill the prisoner. An eyewitness illustrated the ?barbaric ritual? in which it took three charges at thirty second intervals and ten minutes before doctors pronounced Evans dead (NCADP). The witness then went on to Jewett 7say that the officials were apparently embarrassed and one official remarked that the execution was ?supposed to be a very clean manner of administering death? (NCADP). The gas chamber was supposed to be a step ahead of the electric chair. In the gas chamber method, the prisoner is strapped into a chair with a container of sulfuric acid underneath. the chamber is then sealed and cyanide is dropped into the acid to create a lethal gas. As with electrocution, suffocation by inhalation of a lethal gas is not always a quick and clean way of death. In the case of the execution of Don Harding in Arizona, U.S. Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens said that it took Harding more than ten minutes to die. The latest mode of infliction of the death penalty is lethal injection. Some believe that this method is more humane, although killing in itself is plainly inhumane (NCADP). The U.S. Court of Appeals stated that there is ?substantial and uncontested evidence?that execution by lethal injection poses a serious risk of cruel, protracted deatheven a slight error in dosage or administration can leave a prisoner conscious but paralyzed while dying, a sentient witness of his or her own asphyxiation? (NCADP). As with the other methods of execution, death by lethal injection does not always proceed smoothly as planned. In 1985 ?the authorities jabbed needles intoStephen Morin, when they had trouble finding a usable vein because he had been a drug abuser? (NCADP). In a 1988 case during the execut ion of Raymond Landry, ?a tube attached to a needle inside the inmates right arm began leaking, sending he lethal mixture shooting across the death chamber toward witnesses.? Adam Bedau writes that ?its veneer of decency and subtle analogy with life-saving medical practice no doubt makes killing by lethal injection more acceptable to the public? (NCADP). Jewett 8After witnessing an execution, Journalist Susan Blaustein said ?We have perfected the art of institutional killing to the degree that it has deadened our natural, quintessentially human response to death? (NCADP). Most people who observe an execution are mortified and disgusted. Public executions were common in this country during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. One of the last public executions occurred in Kentucky when 20,000 people gathered to watch the hanging of a young African American male (NCADP). It is that inhumane delight in brutality and pain that the supporters of death penalty have cause against, yet th ey are at the level of murder themselves. Society must insist that the law not encourage such violent crime, for when the government ceremoniously carries out the cruel execution of a prisoner, the violent side of human nature is being allowed. Cesare Beccaria, an Italian jurist said ?The death penalty cannot be useful, because of the example of barbarity it gives men?. Even if capital punishment was ?useful? it would still be an example of the very brutality and violence the death penalty is supposed to prevent (?Against the Death Penalty?). Such methods of human torture and killing is allowed by retentionists to be hidden in the system we call justice. Supreme Court Justice Arthur J. Godberg wrote ?the deliberate institutionalized taking of human life by the state is the greatest conceivable degradation of the dignity of human personality? (?Against the Death Penalty?). Society not only suffers from the burden of dealing with those lives which have been lost to an immoral and brut al execution, but will also suffer from the great deal of tax dollars spent to put their unjustified ways into action. From the time of arrest to the point of execution, it can be estimated that a single death sentence costs between one to three million dollars per case (NCADP). Some studies have figures as high as seven million per case. Life imprisonment, including incarceration, costs roughly five hundred thousand dollars. The millions of dollars spent Jewett 9on the unnecessary killing of one individual cuts into funds for more important needs, such as public safety and education (NCADP). Justice often insists that the death penalty is the suitable punishment for brutal crimes. According to Bedau, ?by its nature, all punishment is retributive? (?Against the Death Penalty?). Therefore, a punishment can be satisfied without killing. Moreover, the death penalty could only be used for the crime of murder and not for any of the several other crimes that have recently been considered as capital crimes such as rape, kidnaping, treason, drug trafficking, and espionage. Execution is an unnecessary punishment for murder. Albert Camus wrote that ?for there to be equivalence, the death penalty would have to punish a criminal who had warned his victim of the date at which he would inflict a horrible death on him and who, from that moment onward, had confined him at his mercy for months. Such a monster is not encountered in private life? (Warner). It is also often argued that death is what murderers deserve, and that those who oppose the death penalty violate the ?eye for an eye? principle, the ideal of making the punishment fit the crime. If this rule means that punishments are unsuitable unless they are like the crime, then the principle is unacceptable. Such an ideal would mean that we must rape the rapists, torture the torturers, and inflict other degrading punishments on the convicted (Nathanson 133). We would have to betray traitors, and kill multiple murderers mu ltiple times, which are obviously penalties impossible to impose. Since we cannot reasonably punish all crimes according to this ideal, it is irrational to impose execution as a required punishment for murder. Criminals do deserve to be punished, and the severity of punishment should be appropriate to the harm they have caused the Jewett 10innocent. But the severity of punishment must have limits limits enforced by both justice and our common human dignity (Barzilai). Governments that enforce these limits do not use premeditated, violent homicide as a tool in society. There are people who have lost a loved one to murder that believe that they cannot rest until the murderer is executed, but not all of those inflicted with such a loss feel the same. Coretta Scott King said that ?as one whose husband and mother-in-law have died the victims of murder and assassination, I stand firmly and unequivocally opposed to the death penalty for those convicted of capital offenses. An evil deed is not remedied by an evil deed of retaliation. Justice is never advanced in the taking of human life. Morality is never upheld by a legalized murder ? (Barzilai). Victims to the loss of a loved one do not need to reduce themselves to the evil level of the murderer, but those families need to replace their anger and hate towards the criminal in a more healthy manner for both the offender and the survivors. Although it can be easier said than done, the right to live belongs to all of the members of society regardless of what crime one has committed. It is not the right of the government, nor the right of any individual to inflict such cruel and hateful punishments onto another human being. Beyond the statistics we can see a brutal and unnecessary punishment. There must be limits to the power that a government has, as well as the power individuals in a society have. We degrade the murderer, yet the supporters of capital punishment reserve the passion to kill. As sane people with a respe ct for human life and dignity, we must not turn into the vicious murderer some of us fight to kill. According to Stephen Nathanson, we must set an example of the behavior we find acceptable in society. He goes on to say that ?even though this person has done wrong and Jewett 11even though we may be angry, outraged, and indignant with him, we will nonetheless control ourselves in a way that he did not. We will not kill him? ( Nathanson 137). We must not contradict the principle that murder is wrong, including the murder of a criminal. We must not kill, nor must any government hold the power to take a human life, no matter what the crime. BibliographyWorks Cited?Against the Death Penalty.? Amnesty International. http://www.amnesty.org Dieter, Richard. ?The Practical Burdens of Capital Punishment.? The Encyclopedia of Ethics. Censorship of Media Violence Argumentative Persuas Essay New York: Macmillan, 1967. Glover, Jonathan. ?Deterrence and Murder.? New York: Garland, 1992. Mappes, Thomas A., and Jane S. Zambaty. Social Ethics: Morality and Social Policy. U.S.: McGraw, 1997. National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty (NCADP). http://www.ncadp.org Smart, Christopher. ?Innocence Found on Death Row.? http://weeklywire.com Warner, Ralph. ?Killing Carelessly.? http://www.crimemagazine.com Government Essays

Alcoholic Liver Disease free essay sample

Liver disease related to alcohol consumption fits into one of three categories: fatty liver (Steatosis), alcoholic hepatitis (Steatohepatitis), and alcoholic cirrhosis. Alcoholic fatty liver is a condition that can develop within days of excessive alcohol consumption. Typically there are no signs and symptoms of this condition and the patient will not be aware of the fact that it has occurred. Alcoholic hepatitis is an inflammation of the liver due to the toxic effects of alcohol and usually occurs after years of alcohol consumption. The signs and symptoms are usually vague but can range from mild discomfort to a life-threatening conditions involving bleeding. The final stage is the alcoholic cirrhosis or end stage liver disease. Alcoholic cirrhosis is the primary cause of cirrhosis in the Western world. It is estimated that it is responsible for 44% of cirrhosis deaths in North America ( Dickerson, 2006). Pathophysiology The initial change, the fatty liver is just what it sounds like, an accumulation of fat within the liver cells. We will write a custom essay sample on Alcoholic Liver Disease or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page In the fatty liver, large droplets of fat, containing mostly triglycerides, collect within the liver cells (Gale, 2006). Fatty liver stage is usually asymptomatic and reversible with the reduction of alcohol. The second stage alcoholic hepatitis is when inflammation and cell necrosis occurs. During this stage fibrous tissues form which is irreversible and can lead to obstruction of blood and bile flow. The progression of hepatitis can vary from person to person and continued alcohol consumption. Continuing alcohol consumption will lead to the third and final stage of alcoholic liver disease; alcoholic cirrhosis. Alcoholic cirrhosis is a disorder in which the liver demonstrates extensive diffuse fibrosis and loss of lobular organization (Gould, 2006); Now that we know what the progression of the disease looks like, let’s take a look at the cause of the disease. The cause of alcoholic liver disease is obviously caused by the abuse of alcohol. Heavy drinking over many years may lead to liver damage and disease. There is a clear dose-dependant relationship between the alcohol intake and the occurrence of cirrhosis. The amount of alcohol is variable, but quantities greater than four or five beers a day are considered harmful. Some researchers estimate the alcoholism related numbers in cirrhosis to be as high as 75 to 80% (Dickerson, 2006). Although alcohol consumption plays the main role in the development of alcoholic liver disease, genetics and gender also play a role in who will be more likely to develop the disease. Since we all know that the liver metabolizes most drugs put into our bodies, it is easy to see that drugs used to treat liver disease are slim. I have chosen to tell you about the most widely studied drug used in liver disease; corticosteroids.

Ivys Essay Essays

Ivys Essay Essays Ivys Essay Essay Ivys Essay Essay Travel Broadens the Mind Saint Augustine once said â€Å"the world is a book, and those who do not travel read only a page†. Traveling, like reading, broadens the mind. It enriches life experience, sparks inspiration and makes people poised. Travel enriches life experience. It is a process of feeling the world: enjoying beautiful sceneries, tasting different food, meeting interesting people and experiencing new cultures. I traveled a lot when I was a kid. I remember once when I was in the Liangshan yi autonomous region, Sichuan, my parents took me to the Torch Festival. People dressed in clothes with Yi features, surrounded a big torch, dancing and singing with great joy. I was highly affected by the atmosphere, my face was reddened and my whole world was lighted up. I can still remember those smiling faces and joyful cheers. Travel offers us a shot to better understand the world and make us more open to embrace the new things which could make our life more exciting and meaningful. Travel sparks inspiration. Whiling traveling, we enter a totally different space, the air we breathe; the language we hear; the food we try can always arouse our love for life and give us inspiration. San Mao, a famous Chinese writer, composed most of her works while traveling. One of her best known work The Story of Sahara is about her experience in the northern Africa. This book vividly described the lifestyle, culture and native people in the Sahara Desert. If she had never been there, there would be no such a wonderful work. Besides writers, musicians and artists often get inspired through travel. On the journey, we might meet obstacles. A flat tire, a landslide, or extreme weather may make us feel scared and panic, but somehow we can tough it out. After all those experience, we will be awed by nature and be brave and poised no matter what happens in our life. Life is a book, and with travel, we can read through the pages and make our life rich and beautiful.

Male, Masculine, Virility Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Male, Masculine, Virility - Assignment Example and bodily health are the distinguishing characters in the personality of a perfect man and are often highlighted in men related to military or sports. The sense of independence and sacrifice makes him the focal point of pride and attention. Considering from a physical point of view, the perfect soldier has a well built frame, perfect height, a muscular figure and above all the perfect attitude. Who does not notice a soldier? He is the one fighting for the sovereignty of his country and wherever he is mentioned, shown or written about no one can deny the vitality of their purpose. The country’s defenses are vested upon its military. Usually countries engage each other in cold wars which are more political than physical but sometimes things get ugly and that is when military comes into action. This valor, bravery and prestige are the identification of a virile man. No imaginary depiction of superheroes can compete with a real life existing soldier ready to sacrifice his life in the name of his people. The self- respect, honor and pride associated with this notion are a source of benefit for the entire nation. This not only gives the nation a sense of confidence and security but also something to get inspired from. As far as physical disabilities are concerned, society attributes such men to be weak and vulnerable, while for them this approach is a source of constant self-pity and dependence. It destroys the remainder of their talents and points of encouragement; all this in the name of natural disabilities. â€Å"Paralytic disability constitutes emasculation of a more direct and total nature. For the male, the weakening and atrophy of the body threaten all the cultural values o masculinity: strength, activeness, speed, virility, stamina, and fortitude.†(Murphy 94) For men their bodies are the focal point of identification and attribution. In military special attention is given to physical health of soldiers along with stamina building. So they form an

The four agreements by Don Miguel Ruiz Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

The four agreements by Don Miguel Ruiz - Essay Example They proposed that the environment we live in is in fact a very sophisticated dream, and that each person is a reflection of another. Thus, we are all connected. That everything we do and say is a standard regime that we are each gradually programmed with as we grow. This pantheistic picture is what the Toltecs preserved through the centuries. It elevates man to a divine level, and it all depends with how we see ourselves. Although there are many pacts, or agreements, we make with society, God, and our fellow man, the most important agreements are those we make with ourselves, which will ultimately determine who we become. Don Miguel clearly outlines four of these agreements that, if reached, will transform and elevate the person’s life into a whole new aspect of the dream. The drama of hell that life brings will disappear, and the person will be creating his own personal dream of heaven. The first agreement is the most important, but most challenging to keep. It is to be impe ccable with your word. Because the word is very powerful, having the capability to either build or destroy. Don Miguel writes that, â€Å"The word is the most powerful tool you have as a human; it is the tool of magic. But like a sword with two edges, your word can create the most beautiful dream or your word can destroy everything around you.† He says that when your word becomes impeccable, or flawless, you grow seeds of love. You are released from fear and are free to live a life of happiness even though everyone around you is not. With this one agreement alone, you can transcend to the level of existence called heaven on earth. The second agreement is don’t take anything personally. For example, if a random person on the street, who does not know you, calls you stupid, and you accept it, then you will believe you are stupid, and you alone will be affected. The author writes that, â€Å"you take it personally because you agree with what was said, and as soon as you do, the poison goes through you, and you are trapped in the dream of hell.† But if you don’t, then no one can hurt you and you will break many negative habits and routines. The third agreement is don’t make assumptions. Because when we do so believing they are real, then we act on them and make life miserable. If we never assumed at the beginning, we would avoid much trouble. A lot of emotional poison is created and people are hurt or deceived. The fourth agreement is always do your best. This one sets the other three in a firm platform. Although it may vary due to conditions, as time goes by, it will become better than it used to be. Life will become more lively and fulfilling. Everything else will fall into place, and you will attain happiness. These are the four agreements of Don Miguel. They can be inculcated into many societies and professions. One such profession is the field of nursing. Because it deals with individual people in a benevolent way, these fou r agreements achieve a lot of success in such an environment. BODY The nursing field is defined by challenging, tough tasks. Compared with other professions, the nurse is the most indispensable. It is a matter of life and death, so it is very important that he not only knows what’s being done, but he should also be aware of himself. The way he sees and carries himself will influence the results of his actions greatly. The nurse who learns to instill within himself these four agreem